Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959545›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2023

Discovery of novel glioma serum biomarkers by proximity extension assay.

Atefeh Ghorbani, Lisa M Avery, Dorsa Sohaei, Andrea Soosaipillai, Maxime Richer, Craig Horbinski, Katy McCortney, Wei Xu, Eleftherios P Diamandis, Ioannis Prassas

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Associations ofTranslational pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in Mass Spectrometry of Gangliosides Expressed in Brain Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Atefeh GhorbaniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lisa M AveryBiostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Dorsa SohaeiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea SoosaipillaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Maxime RicherAxe Neurosciences du Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de, Québec-Université Laval et Département de Biologie Moléculaire, Biochimie et Pathologie de l'Université, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Craig HorbinskiFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katy McCortneyFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Wei XuBiostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Eleftherios P DiamandisDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. eleftherios.diamandis@sinaihealth.ca.
Ioannis PrassasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Scientific Associate, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. yprassas@gmail.com.
University of Toronto · CAPublic Health Ontario · CACentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval · CALunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CANorthwestern Medicine · USNorthwestern University · USSinai Health System · CA

Funding

STINGing GBM: A First-in- Man Clinical Trial in Surgical Resectable Recurrent GBMP50CA221747 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Atique U. Ahmed · 2018 to 2026
$21.4M
Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Brain tumor CCS707057NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGliomas are among the most malignant tumors, with a very poor prognosis. Early diagnosis is highly desirable since it can help implement more effective treatments for smaller tumors, which have not yet extensively metastasized. Improving early diagnosis may facilitate access of patients to clinical trials and prepare them for the future availability of new disease-modifying treatments.

methodsWe analyzed retrospective samples collected at diagnosis (before therapy initiation), with PEA (Olink Proteomics), quantifying about 3000 proteins. We utilized 30 plasmas from gliomas (20 glioblastomas, 5 anaplastic astrocytomas, 5 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas) and 20 meningiomas (as controls). We then analyzed the data to identify proteins which either alone, or in combination, could discriminate gliomas from meningiomas, or correlate with clinical and molecular alterations.

resultsWe identified 8 plasma proteins which were increased in gliomas vs. meningiomas (GFAP, NEFL, EDDM3B, PROK1, MMP3, CTRL, GP2, SPINT3) and 4 proteins which were decreased in gliomas vs. meningiomas (FABP4, ALDH3A1, IL-12B and OXT). Partition algorithms and logistic regression algorithms with two biomarkers (GFAP and FABP4) achieved sensitivity of 83% and 93% at 100% and 90% specificity, respectively. The strongest single marker was GFAP with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.86. The AUC for the GFAP-FABP4 combination was 0.98.

conclusionPEA is a powerful new proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. GFAP and a handful of other plasma biomarkers may be useful for early glioma detection and probably, prognosis. STATEMENT: Detecting gliomas as early as possible is highly desirable since it can significantly improve the chances of effective treatments. Reliable glioma biomarkers can timely inform glioma patients about the efficacy of their prescribed treatment. Our results reveal some novel putative glioma markers that may prove valuable, when used alone or in combination, towards improved clinical care of gliomas. In order to better appreciate the potential usefulness of these markers, their performance needs to be further validated in a larger cohort of samples.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEarly diagnosisGliomaLiquid biopsyOLINK technologyProximity extension assay (PEA)

Identifiers

PMID36959545
PMCPMC10037798
OpenAlexW4360816350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read32
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.