Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959531›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Study of the error correction capability of multiple sequence alignment algorithm (MAFFT) in DNA storage.

Ranze Xie, Xiangzhen Zan, Ling Chu, Yanqing Su, Peng Xu, Wenbin Liu

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA Data Storage.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ranze Xie *Institution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xiangzhen Zan *Institution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Ling ChuInstitution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yanqing SuInstitution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Peng XuInstitution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. gdxupeng@gzhu.edu.cn.
Wenbin LiuInstitution of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. wbliu6910@gzhu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchronization (insertions-deletions) errors are still a major challenge for reliable information retrieval in DNA storage. Unlike traditional error correction codes (ECC) that add redundancy in the stored information, multiple sequence alignment (MSA) solves this problem by searching the conserved subsequences. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive simulation study on the error correction capability of a typical MSA algorithm, MAFFT. Our results reveal that its capability exhibits a phase transition when there are around 20% errors. Below this critical value, increasing sequencing depth can eventually allow it to approach complete recovery. Otherwise, its performance plateaus at some poor levels. Given a reasonable sequencing depth (≤ 70), MSA could achieve complete recovery in the low error regime, and effectively correct 90% of the errors in the medium error regime. In addition, MSA is robust to imperfect clustering. It could also be combined with other means such as ECC, repeated markers, or any other code constraints. Furthermore, by selecting an appropriate sequencing depth, this strategy could achieve an optimal trade-off between cost and reading speed. MSA could be a competitive alternative for future DNA storage.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNAComputer SimulationSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNADNA storageError correctionMAFFTMultiple sequence alignment

Identifiers

PMID36959531
PMCPMC10037887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read55
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.