Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959525›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2023

Do surgical drains reduce surgical site occurrence and infection after incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh? A non-randomised pilot study.

V Louis, S Diab, A Villemin, C Brigand, S Manfredelli, J-B Delhorme, S Rohr, B Romain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V LouisDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
S DiabDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
A VilleminDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
C BrigandDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
S ManfredelliDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
J-B DelhormeDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
S RohrDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
B RomainDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, 2 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France. benoit.romain@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-1079
Hôpital d'Hautepierre · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical site occurrence (SSO) and surgical site infection (SSI) are common concerns with incisional hernia repair. Intraoperative drain placement is a common practice aiming to reduce SSO and SSI rates. However, literature on the matter is very poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of subcutaneous and periprosthetic drain placement on postoperative outcomes and SSO and SSI rates with incisional hernia repair.

methodsA non-randomised pilot study was performed between January 2018 and December 2020 and included patients with elective midline or lateral incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh placement. Patients were prospectively included, followed for 1 month and divided into three groups: group 1 without drainage, group 2 with subcutaneous drainage, and group 3 with subcutaneous and periprosthetic drains. Drains were placed at surgeon's discretion. All patients were included in the enhanced recovery program.

resultsOne hundred and four patients were included. Twenty-four patients (23.1%) did not have drains (group 1), 60 patients (57.7%) had a subcutaneous drain (group 2) and 20 patients (19.2%) had both a subcutaneous and a periprosthetic drains (group 3). SSO rates were significantly different between the 3 groups: 20.8% in group 1, 20.7% in group 2 and 50% in group 3 (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in deep and superficial SSI rates between the 3 groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that adding a drain in direct contact with the mesh significantly increased SSO rate but did not influence SSI rate. Length of stay was also significantly increased by the presence of a drain, 3.1 ± 1.9 days for group 1; 5.9 ± 4.8 for group 2 and 5.9 ± 2.5 days for group 3 (p < 0.005).

conclusionDrain placement in direct contact with the mesh might increase SSO rate. More studies are necessary to evaluate the actual benefits of drainage after incisional hernia repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaDrainageHerniorrhaphyHumansPilot ProjectsSurgical MeshSurgical Wound InfectionDrainDrainageIncisional hernia repair

Identifiers

PMID36959525
OpenAlexW4360602720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.