Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959446›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Specificities of Modeling of Membrane Proteins Using Multi-Template Homology Modeling.

Julia Koehler Leman, Richard Bonneau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia Koehler LemanCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Richard BonneauCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Simons Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structures of membrane proteins are challenging to determine experimentally and currently represent only about 2% of the structures in the Protein Data Bank. Because of this disparity, methods for modeling membrane proteins are fewer and of lower quality than those for modeling soluble proteins. However, better expression, crystallization, and cryo-EM techniques have prompted a recent increase in experimental structures of membrane proteins, which can act as templates to predict the structure of closely related proteins through homology modeling. Because homology modeling relies on a structural template, it is easier and more accurate than fold recognition methods or de novo modeling, which are used when the sequence similarity between the query sequence and the sequence of related proteins in structural databases is below 25%. In homology modeling, a query sequence is mapped onto the coordinates of a single template and refined. With the increase in available templates, several templates often cover overlapping segments of the query sequence. Multi-template modeling can be used to identify the best template for local segments and join them into a single model. Here we provide a protocol for modeling membrane proteins from multiple templates in the Rosetta software suite. This approach takes advantage of several integrated frameworks, namely, RosettaScripts, RosettaCM, and RosettaMP with the membrane scoring function.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsSoftwareModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationStructural Homology, ProteinMembrane ProteinsComparative modelingHomology modelingMembrane proteinsMultiple templatesProtein structure predictionRosetta

Identifiers

PMID36959446
OpenAlexW4360763556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.