ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Quality Estimates for 3D Protein Models.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protein structure accuracy estimation using geometry-complete perceptron networks.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein structure modeling is one of the most advanced and complex processes in computational biology. One of the major problems for the protein structure prediction field has been how to estimate the accuracy of the predicted 3D models, on both a local and global level, in the absence of known structures. We must be able to accurately measure the confidence that we have in the quality predicted 3D models of proteins for them to become widely adopted by the general bioscience community. To address this major issue, it was necessary to develop new model quality assessment (MQA) methods and integrate them into our pipelines for building 3D protein models. Our MQA method, called ModFOLD, has been ranked as one of the most accurate MQA tools in independent blind evaluations. This chapter discusses model quality assessment in the protein modeling field, demonstrating both its strengths and limitations. We also present some of the best methods according to independent benchmarking data, which has been gathered in recent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36959444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.