ArticleBone marrow transplantation2023
"Incidence and significance of donor-specific antibodies in haploidentical stem cell transplantation".
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Review
- Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.Oncology and therapy · 2024Review
- Toward a definition of immunological risk for patients with anti-HLA antibodies before stem cell transplantation.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2024Article
- Donor specific antibodies (DSA): the only risk factor for primary graft failure?Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- The impact of donor-specific antibodies' presence on the outcome post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a survey from a single center.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Management of donor-specific antibodies in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A retrospective single-center case-control study.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PGF is a devastating complication after allogeneic transplant. We retrospectively analyzed our haploidentical transplant registry to report the incidence and impact of DSA and anti-HLA on engraftment. 107 patients were identified. Median recipient-age of 22, median donor-age of 31. Sixty-two patients had AML (58%), 29 had ALL (27%), 16 (15%) had other malignancies. Sixty-one recipients (57%) had positive anti-HLA, 56 of them had the DSA results available, of these 17 patients had DSAs (15% of the total number of patients, or 28% of patients who have anti-HLA antibodies). The median cumulative MFI was 2062. Sixty-three percent of the DSA were against class-II HLA antigens. The OS, CIR, aGvHD, and cGvHD did not differ between patients with and without anti-HLA antibodies, nor between patients with and without DSA. The gender of the recipient and donor, as well as the gender mismatch between recipient and donor, were statistically associated with the incidence of anti-HLA antibodies. Three patients only developed GF (2.8%), one was primary (0.9%) and the other two secondary GF (1.9%). None of the GF cases was in patients with anti-HLA antibodies or DSA. The presence of anti-HLA or DSAs did not affect the outcomes including the incidence of PGF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36959370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.