Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959306›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Bone, cognitive, and anthropometric profiles and their relation to fracture sites in fallers: a cross-sectional study.

Maëlle Baillet, Rémy Morello, Olivier Vittecoq, Chantal Chavoix, Christian Marcelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maëlle BailletINSERM, UniCaen, U1075, COMETE, PFRS, Normandie University, Caen, France.
Rémy MorelloDepartment of Statistics and Clinical Research, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Olivier VittecoqDepartment of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Chantal ChavoixINSERM, UniCaen, U1075, COMETE, PFRS, Normandie University, Caen, France.
Christian MarcelliINSERM, UniCaen, U1075, COMETE, PFRS, Normandie University, Caen, France. marcelli-c@chu-caen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-2467

Funding

Ministère Français de la Santé et de la Prévention PHRC Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2011 no. 2011-A00534-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk factors involved in the different osteoporotic fracture locations are not well-known. The results of this study suggest that there is not one typical profile characterising a particular fracture site but that the occurrence of a fracture may result from the combination of different bone, cognitive, and anthropometrics characteristics. PURPOSE: Risk factors involved in the different osteoporotic fracture locations are not well-known. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in bone, cognitive, and anthropometric characteristics between different fracture sites, and to determine whether the site of a fall-related fracture is related to a specific profile.

methodsOne hundred six women aged 55 years and older with a recent fall-related fracture of the hip (n = 30), humerus (n = 28), wrist (n = 32), or ankle (n = 16) were included. Bone, cognitive, and anthropometric characteristics were first compared among the four fracture site groups. Then, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed and a comparison was made between the four profiles identified by the first two PCA components.

resultsThe four fracture site groups differed significantly in their education level, bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), fear of falling, and number of errors in the Trail Making Test B, an executive function test. Each of the four fracture sites was found in each four PCA profiles, albeit with a different distribution. The profiles differed mainly by bone, cognitive, and anthropometric characteristics, but also by fear of falling.

conclusionsThe fall-related fracture sites differ significantly in anthropometric and bone parameters, in fear of falling and in cognitive abilities. There is not one typical bone, cognitive, and anthropometric profile characterising a particular fall-related site, but rather several possible profiles for a given site. This suggests that the fracture site depends on a combination of several characteristics of the patient.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHumansRisk FactorsBone-brain-nervous system interactionsDXAFracture risk assessmentOsteoporosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.