Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959244›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The perspectives of UK personnel towards current killing practices for laboratory rodents.

Jasmine M Clarkson, Matthew C Leach, Dorothy E F McKeegan, Jessica E Martin

Full text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasmine M ClarksonInstitute of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland. jasmine.clarkson@newcastle.ac.uk.
Matthew C LeachComparative Biology Centre, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
Dorothy E F McKeeganInstitute of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Jessica E MartinSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013759/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S007210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodents are the predominant species used for scientific research and must be humanely killed upon completion of the work. In the UK this is regulated by Schedule 1 of the Animals Scientific Procedures Act 1986, which lists permitted methodologies considered capable of humane killing, including overdose of an anaesthetic, exposure to carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Animal WelfareRodentiaAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryCarbon DioxideUnited KingdomCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID36959244
PMCPMC10036518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read125
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.