ArticleScientific reports2023
Solution proposal for completed preference structure in ORESTE method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a novel integrated method including CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation) and ORESTE (Organisation, Rangement Et Synth&e De DonnCes Relarionnelles) methods from MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) methods and aiming to solve the problem of inconsistency in the ORESTE method has been proposed. Since the ORESTE method only considers the ordering of alternatives and criteria, a conflict may occur due to the different ordering of each alternative in the criteria. To solve the conflict problem in the second step of the ORESTE method, it is proposed to create the preference density matrix of the alternatives by using the CRITIC weights of the criteria, and to calculate the net flow values with reference to the PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Encrichment Evaluations II) method (C-ORESTE III). The CRITIC method is used because the relationship between the criteria is as important as the alternatives in calculating the normalized preference intensities. To test the validity and applicability of the proposed method, an application is made to the logistics center location problem within the scope of green logistics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.