Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36959195›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2023

Impact of small farmers' access to improved seeds and deforestation in DR Congo.

Tanguy Bernard, Sylvie Lambert, Karen Macours, Margaux Vinez

Full text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanguy BernardBordeaux School of Economics, Univ. Bordeaux, Pessac, 33600, France.
Sylvie LambertParis School of Economics, INRAE, Paris, 75014, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-2614
Karen MacoursParis School of Economics, INRAE, Paris, 75014, France. karen.macours@psemail.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-1585-4418
Margaux VinezWorld Bank, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1960s, the increased availability of modern seed varieties in developing countries has had large positive effects on households' well-being. However, the effect of related land use changes on deforestation and biodiversity is ambiguous. This study examines this question through a randomized control trial in a remote area in the Congo Basin rainforest with weak input and output markets. Using plot-level data on land conversion combined with remote sensing data, we find that promotion of modern seed varieties did not lead to an increase in overall deforestation by small farmers. However, farmers cleared more primary forest and less secondary forest. We attribute this to the increased demand for nitrogen required by the use of some modern seed varieties, and to the lack of alternative sources of soil nutrients, which induced farmers to shift towards cultivation of land cleared in primary forest. Unless combined with interventions to maintain soil fertility, policies to promote modern seed varieties may come at the cost of important losses in biodiversity.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesDemocratic Republic of the CongoFarmersHumansSeedsSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID36959195
PMCPMC10036623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read38
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.