Observational studyBMJ open2023
Older patient participation in discharge medication communication: an observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Involvement in medication safety behaviors among older people with chronic diseases: systematic review of intervention studies.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Enhancing patient participation in discharge medication communication: a feasibility pilot trial.BMJ open · 2024Trial
- Medication communication and management: exploring the experiences and observations of older patients with multimorbidity and their families at hospital discharge.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Co-design of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality handover of medicine information at discharge from hospital.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Observational
- Contextual Factors Affecting Adherence Revealed by Old Patients with Heart Failure in Hospital and Primary Care Interactions: A Descriptive Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the extent to which older patients participate in discharge medication communication, and identify factors that predict patient participation in discharge medication communication.
designObservational study.
settingAn Australian metropolitan tertiary hospital.
participants173 older patients were observed undertaking one medication communication encounter prior to hospital discharge. OUTCOME: Patient participation measured with MEDICODE, a valid and reliable coding framework used to analyse medication communication. MEDICODE provides two measures for patient participation: (1) Preponderance of Initiative and (2) Dialogue Ratio.
resultsThe median for Preponderance of Initiative was 0.7 (IQR=0.5-1.0) and Dialogue Ratio was 0.3 (IQR=0.2-0.4), indicating healthcare professionals took more initiative and medication encounters were mostly monologue rather than a dialogue or dyad. Logistic regression revealed that patients had 30% less chance of having dialogue or dyads with every increase in one medication discussed (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9, p=0.01). Additionally, the higher the patient's risk of a medication-related problem, the more initiative the healthcare professionals took in the conversation (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1, p=0.04).
conclusionOlder patients are passive during hospital discharge medication conversations. Discussing less medications over several medication conversations spread throughout patient hospitalisation and targeting patients at high risk of medication-related problems may promote more active patient participation, and in turn medication safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.