Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36958179›Full record

ArticlePlacenta2023

Machine learning classification of placental villous infarction, perivillous fibrin deposition, and intervillous thrombus.

Jeffery A Goldstein, Ramin Nateghi, Ismail Irmakci, Lee A D Cooper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Placenta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jeffery A GoldsteinNorthwestern University, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: ja.goldstein@northwestern.edu.
Ramin NateghiNorthwestern University, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ismail IrmakciNorthwestern University, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lee A D CooperNorthwestern University, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, USA; Northwestern University, McCormick School of Engineering, Evanston, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Guiding humans to create better labeled datasets for machine learning in biomedical researchR01LM013523 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LEE, ENQUOBAHRIE, ANDINET ASMAMAW · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
Informatics Tools for Quantitative Digital Pathology Profiling and Integrated Prognostic ModelingU01CA220401 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LEE, FLOWERS, CHRISTOPHER R · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
Developing a virtual placenta biobankK08EB030120 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY A · 2020 to 2023
$575k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NCI NIH HHS U01 CA220401NIBIB NIH HHS K08 EB030120NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlacental parenchymal lesions are commonly encountered and carry significant clinical associations. However, they are frequently missed or misclassified by general practice pathologists. Interpretation of pathology slides has emerged as one of the most successful applications of machine learning (ML) in medicine with applications ranging from cancer detection and prognostication to transplant medicine. The goal of this study was to use a whole-slide learning model to identify and classify placental parenchymal lesions including villous infarctions, intervillous thrombi (IVT), and perivillous fibrin deposition (PVFD).

methodsWe generated whole slide images from placental discs examined at our institution with infarct, IVT, PVFD, or no macroscopic lesion. Slides were analyzed as a set of overlapping patches. We extracted feature vectors from each patch using a pretrained convolutional neural network (EfficientNetV2L). We trained a model to assign attention to each vector and used the attentions as weights to produce a pooled feature vector. The pooled vector was classified as normal or 1 of 3 lesions using a fully connected network. Patch attention was plotted to highlight informative areas of the slide.

resultsOverall balanced accuracy in a test set of held-out slides was 0.86 with receiver-operator characteristic areas under the curve of 0.917-0.993. Cases of PVFD were frequently miscalled as normal or infarcts, the latter possibly due to the perivillous fibrin found at the periphery of infarctions. We used attention maps to further understand some errors, including one most likely due to poor tissue fixation and processing. DISCUSSION: We used a whole-slide learning paradigm to train models to recognize three of the most common placental parenchymal lesions. We used attention maps to gain insight into model function, which differed from intuitive explanations.

Indexed as

Placenta DiseasesThrombosisFemaleFibrinHumansInfarctionMachine LearningPlacentaPregnancyFibrinArtificial intelligenceInfarctionIntervillous thrombusMachine learningPerivillous fibrinPlacenta pathology

Identifiers

PMID36958179
PMCPMC10156426
OpenAlexW4324344275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.