Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36958173›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and public health2023

Molecular docking of monkeypox (mpox) virus proteinase with FDA approved lead molecules.

M Valan Arasu, P Vijayaragavan, Sumitha Purushothaman, M A Rathi, Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi, V K Gopalakrishnan, Ki Choon Choi, S Ilavenil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Atomic-level binding interaction analysis ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Insight into Protein Engineering: FromCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

M Valan ArasuDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
P VijayaragavanBioprocess Engineering Division, Smykon Biotech Pvt LtD, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu 629201, India.
Sumitha PurushothamanBioprocess Engineering Division, Smykon Biotech Pvt LtD, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu 629201, India.
M A RathiDepartment of Biochemistry and Cancer Research Center, FASCM, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641 021, Tamil Nadu, India.
Naif Abdullah Al-DhabiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
V K GopalakrishnanSchool of Medicine, Bule Hora University Institute of Health, Bule Hora University, BuleHora, Ethiopia. Electronic address: vkgopalakrishnan@gmail.com.
Ki Choon ChoiGrassland and Forage Division, Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan 31000, Republic of Korea.
S IlavenilGrassland and Forage Division, Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Animal Science, Cheonan 31000, Republic of Korea.
King Saud University · SABule Hora University · ETKarpagam Academy of Higher Education · INNational Institute of Animal Science · KRRural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonkeypox virus (mpox) disease is caused by a double-stranded DNA virus from the Poxviridae family. The mpox virus showed structural similarity with smallpox virus disease. The recent outbreak of mpox infection in the rest of African countries causes public health issues of increased pandemic potential. Mpox virus is involved in the viral replication cycle through the biocatalytic reaction of precursor polyproteins cleavage.

objectivesThe main objective of the study was to analyze the molecular interactions between mpox and FDA-approved drugs.

methodsThe primary and secondary structure of the protein was retrieved and FDA approved drug was screened using AutoDock. The best hit was analyzed and the molecular interactions were studied. Model validation analyzes the peptide, energy of hydrogen bonds, steric conflicts and bond planarity. Z-score was calculated using ProSA-web tool and the score tested the native fold from other alternative folds.

resultsThe confidence level of the submitted amino acids was> 80 % and the maximum confidence score for a single template was 98.2 %. The generated proteinase model was subjected to analyze the distribution of atoms and the using ERRAT server. The overall quality score was 88.535 and this value represents the amino acid percentage with anticipated error value and the value falling below the rejection limit. The Z-score of this study result was within the Z-score range (-4.17) validated for native enzymes. The binding pockets of the enzyme were determined in this study and two binding pockets were predicted using the automatic online tool using the web server. The selected FDA-approved drugs were ordered based on their minimum binding energy to the proteinase.

conclusionsMolecular docking studies revealed the involvement of various hydrophobic interactions between FDA-approved drugs and amino acid residues of monkeypox virus proteinase.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxPeptide HydrolasesAmino AcidsHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMonkeypox virusAmino AcidsPeptide HydrolasesApproved drugsDrug moleculesMonkeypoxProteins

Identifiers

PMID36958173
PMCPMC9990884
OpenAlexW4323353167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.