Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36958130›Full record

SynthesisGeneral hospital psychiatry

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent perinatal depression: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Emma Motrico, Rena Bina, Angelos P Kassianos, Huynh-Nhu Le, Vera Mateus, Deniz Oztekin, Maria F Rodriguez-Muñoz, Patricia Moreno-Peral, Sonia Conejo-Cerón

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Emma MotricoDepartment of Psychology, University Loyola Andalucía, Spain. Electronic address: emotrico@uloyola.es.
Rena BinaSchool of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK; Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianos, Limassol 3036, Cyprus.
Huynh-Nhu LeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Vera MateusPortucalense Institute for Human Development (INPP), Department of Psychology and Education, Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal; Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioural Intervention (CINEICC), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Deniz OztekinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İzmir Bakircay University, İzmir, Turkey.
Maria F Rodriguez-MuñozFaculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, (UNED), Spain.
Patricia Moreno-PeralBiomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Spain; Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Málaga (UMA), Spain.
Sonia Conejo-CerónBiomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), ISCIII, Spain.
Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · ESBakırçay ÜniversitesiBar-Ilan University · ILCyprus University of Technology · CYGeorge Washington University · USNational University of Distance Education · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversidad Loyola Andalucía · ESUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, dozens of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) summarize the effectiveness of preventive interventions for perinatal depression. However, the results are inconclusive, making an urgent need to step up to higher levels of evidence synthesis.

aimsTo summarize and compare the evidence from the SR&MA examining the effectiveness of all types of interventions for preventing perinatal depression.

methodPubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey were searched from inception to December 2022. We selected SR&MA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared all types of preventive interventions for perinatal depression with control groups whose outcome was the reduction of depressive symptoms and/or incidence of new cases of perinatal depression (PROSPERO: CRD42020173125).

resultsA total of 19 SRs and MAs evaluated 152 unique RCTs that included 83,408 women from 26 countries and five continents. The median effect size for any intervention was SMD = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.38). Exercise/physical activity-based, psychological, and any type of intervention showed median effect sizes of 0.43, 0.28 and 0.36, respectively. The degree of overlap among RCTs was slight. According to AMSTAR-2, 79% of them were rated as low or critically low-quality. The strength of evidence, according to GRADE, was poorly reported and, in most cases, was low.

conclusionsExercise/physical activity-based and psychological interventions have a small-to-medium effect on reducing perinatal depressive symptoms. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that dietary supplements and pharmacological interventions are effective in preventing perinatal depression. There is a need for high-quality SR&MA of RCTs, mainly focusing on universal preventive interventions.

Indexed as

DepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyPsychosocial InterventionSystematic Reviews as Topicdepressionmeta-analysisPerinatalPreventionRandomized control trialsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36958130
PMCPMC10183436
OpenAlexW4324345071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.