Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36958070›Full record

ReviewBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2023

The role of the radiation therapy breast boost in the 2020s.

M Dzhugashvili, L Veldeman, A M Kirby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M DzhugashviliGenesiscare, Spain. Electronic address: maia.dzhugashvili@genesiscare.es.
L VeldemanGhent University/Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Liv.Veldeman@uzgent.be.
A M KirbyRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, UK. Electronic address: anna.kirby@rmh.nhs.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that most local relapses of breast cancer occur proximal to the original location of the primary, the delivery of additional radiation dose to breast tissue that contained the original primary cancer (known as a "boost") has been a standard of care for some decades. In the context of falling relapse rates, however, it is an appropriate time to re-evaluate the role of the boost. This article reviews the evolution of the radiotherapy boost in breast cancer, discussing who to boost and how to boost in the 2020s, and arguing that, in both cases, less is more.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantBreast boost radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36958070
PMCPMC10068257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.