ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
A systematic evaluation of deep learning methods for the prediction of drug synergy in cancer.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioactivity-driven prediction of antibacterial synergy using machine learning models.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Multiscale higher-order molecular simplicial complex embedding for drug response prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Unified heterogeneity-aware benchmark of drug synergy prediction: a cross-study analysis of traditional machine learning and graph deep learning models.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- DualKG-DC: A Drug-Centric Dual-Layer Knowledge Graph Framework for Drug Combination Prediction.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Learning drug synergy through environment-conditioned feature modulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The role of AI in oncology: present applications and future horizons.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Synergistic anticancer effects of tamoxifen in combination with fisetin and chrysin on breast cancer cells: insights into viability, migration, and apoptosis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cosynllm: predicting drug combination synergy with LLM-generated descriptions.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- MetaComb: a meta-learning framework for drug combination response prediction from cell lines to patients.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- A review of deep learning approaches for drug synergy prediction in cancer.npj drug discovery · 2025Review
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence's Potential to Enhance Conventional Anticancer Drug Development.Drug development research · 2025Review
- SynVerse: a modular framework for building and evaluating deep learning-based drug synergy prediction models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for Multi-Target Drug Discovery: Challenges and Opportunities in Systems Pharmacology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Building a unified model for drug synergy analysis powered by large language models.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of artificial intelligence contributions to precision oncology.Nature cancer · 2025Review
- A guide for active learning in synergistic drug discovery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A semi-supervised weighted SPCA- and convolution KAN-based model for drug response prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Optimizing drug synergy prediction through categorical embeddings in deep neural networks.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Repurposing of the Cardiovascular Drug Statin for the Treatment of Cancers: Efficacy of Statin-Dipyridamole Combination Treatment in Melanoma Cell Lines.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the main obstacles to the successful treatment of cancer is the phenomenon of drug resistance. A common strategy to overcome resistance is the use of combination therapies. However, the space of possibilities is huge and efficient search strategies are required. Machine Learning (ML) can be a useful tool for the discovery of novel, clinically relevant anti-cancer drug combinations. In particular, deep learning (DL) has become a popular choice for modeling drug combination effects. Here, we set out to examine the impact of different methodological choices on the performance of multimodal DL-based drug synergy prediction methods, including the use of different input data types, preprocessing steps and model architectures. Focusing on the NCI ALMANAC dataset, we found that feature selection based on prior biological knowledge has a positive impact-limiting gene expression data to cancer or drug response-specific genes improved performance. Drug features appeared to be more predictive of drug response, with a 41% increase in coefficient of determination (R2) and 26% increase in Spearman correlation relative to a baseline model that used only cell line and drug identifiers. Molecular fingerprint-based drug representations performed slightly better than learned representations-ECFP4 fingerprints increased R2 by 5.3% and Spearman correlation by 2.8% w.r.t the best learned representations. In general, fully connected feature-encoding subnetworks outperformed other architectures. DL outperformed other ML methods by more than 35% (R2) and 14% (Spearman). Additionally, an ensemble combining the top DL and ML models improved performance by about 6.5% (R2) and 4% (Spearman). Using a state-of-the-art interpretability method, we showed that DL models can learn to associate drug and cell line features with drug response in a biologically meaningful way. The strategies explored in this study will help to improve the development of computational methods for the rational design of effective drug combinations for cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.