Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952489›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Estimating pulsatile ocular blood volume from intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude, and axial length.

Ryan H Somogye, Cynthia J Roberts, Eberhard Spoerl, Karin R Pillunat, Lutz E Pillunat, Robert H Small

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan H SomogyeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Cynthia J RobertsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0483-4163
Eberhard SpoerlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Karin R PillunatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Lutz E PillunatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Robert H SmallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-9437
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a method of estimating pulsatile ocular blood volume (POBV) from measurements taken during an ophthalmic exam, including axial length and using a tonometer capable of measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). Unpublished OPA data from a previous invasive study was used in the derivation, along with central corneal thickness (CCT) and axial length (AL), as well as IOP from the PASCAL dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and intracameral (ICM) measurements of IOP for 60 cataract patients. Intracameral mean pressure was set to 15, 20, and 35 mmHg (randomized sequence) in the supine position, using a fluid-filled manometer. IOP and OPA measurements were acquired at each manometric setpoint (DCT and ICM simultaneously). In the current study, ocular rigidity (OR) was estimated using a published significant relationship of OR to the natural log of AL in which OR was invasively measured through fluid injection. Friedenwald's original pressure volume relationship was then used to derive the estimated POBV, delivered to the choroid with each heartbeat as a function of OR, systolic IOP (IOPsys), diastolic IOP (IOPdia), and OPA, according to the derived equation POBV = log (IOPsys/IOPdia) / OR. Linear regression analyses were performed comparing OPA to OR and calculated POBV at each of the three manometric setpoints. POBV was also compared to OPA/IOPdia with all data points combined. Significance threshold was p < 0.05. OR estimated from AL showed a significant positive relationship to OPA for both DCT (p < 0.011) and ICM (p < 0.006) at all three manometric pressure setpoints, with a greater slope for lower IOP. Calculated POBV also showed a significant positive relationship to OPA (p < 0.001) at all three setpoints with greater slope at lower IOP, and a significant negative relationship with IOPdia. In the combined analysis, POBV showed a significant positive relationship to OPA/ IOPdia (p < 0.001) in both ICM and DCT measurements with R2 = 0.9685, and R2 = 0.9589, respectively. POBV provides a straight-forward, clinically applicable method to estimate ocular blood supply noninvasively. Higher IOP in combination with lower OPA results in the lowest values of POBV. The simplified ratio, OPA/ IOPdia, may also provide a useful clinical tool for evaluating changes in ocular blood supply in diseases with a vascular component, such as diabetic retinopathy and normal tension glaucoma. Future studies are warranted.

Indexed as

EyeIntraocular PressureBlood PressureBlood VolumeHeart RateHumansTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID36952489
PMCPMC10035833
OpenAlexW4360609326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
identifiers read12
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.