Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Recruitment strategies and HPV self-collection return rates for under-screened women for cervical cancer prevention.

Jennifer S Smith, Olivia M Vaz, Charley E Gaber, Andrea C Des Marais, Bhavika Chirumamilla, Lori Hendrickson, Lynn Barclay, Alice R Richman, Xian Brooks, Anna Pfaff and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer S SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-0422
Olivia M VazDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Charley E GaberDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Andrea C Des MaraisDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Bhavika ChirumamillaDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Lori HendricksonHospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Lynn BarclayAmerican Sexual Health Association, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States of America.
Alice R RichmanDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Xian BrooksSchool of Nursing, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Anna PfaffDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Noel T BrewerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

Funding

Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, medically underserved women carry a heavier burden of cancer incidence and mortality, yet are largely underrepresented in cancer prevention studies. My Body, My Test is a n observational cohort, multi-phase cervical cancer prevention study in North Carolina that recruited low-income women, aged 30-65 years and who had not undergone Pap testing in ≥ 4 years. Participants were offered home-based self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples for primary HPV testing. Here, we aimed to describe the recruitment strategies utilized by study staff, and the resulting recruitment and self-collection kit return rates for each specific recruitment strategy. Participants were recruited through different approaches: either direct (active, staff-effort intensive) or indirect (passive on the part of study staff). Of a total of 1,475 individuals screened for eligibility, 695 were eligible (47.1%) and 487 (70% of eligible) participants returned their self-collection kit. Small media recruitment resulted in the highest number of individuals found to be study eligible, with a relatively high self-collection kit return of 70%. In-clinic in-reach resulted in a lower number of study-eligible women, yet had the highest kit return rate (90%) among those sent kits. In contrast, 211 recruitment which resulted in the lowest kit return of 54%. Small media, word of mouth, and face-to-face outreach resulted in self-collection kit return rates ranging from 72 to 79%. The recruitment strategies undertaken by study staff support the continued study of reaching under-screened populations into cervical cancer prevention studies.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaePatient Acceptance of Health CareSpecimen HandlingUnited StatesVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID36952486
PMCPMC10035812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read225
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.