Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952251›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2023

Ursodeoxycholic acid in the management of symptomatic gallstone disease: systematic review and clinician survey.

Lewis Hall, James Halle-Smith, Richard Evans, Giles Toogood, Tom Wiggins, Sheraz R Markar, Spyros Kapoulas, Paul Super, Olga Tucker, Siobhan C McKay

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lewis HallCollege of Medical and Dental Scientists, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James Halle-SmithLiver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham UK, Birmingham, UK.
Richard EvansDepartment of Academic Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Giles ToogoodDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, St James' Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Tom WigginsDepartment of UGI Surgery, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-2266
Sheraz R MarkarNuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Spyros KapoulasDepartment of UGI Surgery, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul SuperDepartment of UGI Surgery, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Olga TuckerDepartment of UGI Surgery, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Siobhan C McKayLiver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham UK, Birmingham, UK.
Heartlands Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatic gallstones are common. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a bile acid that dissolves gallstones. There is increasing interest in UDCA for symptomatic gallstones, particularly in those unfit for surgery.

methodA UK clinician survey of use and opinions about UDCA in symptomatic gallstones was performed, assessing clinicians' beliefs and perceptions of UDCA effectiveness. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for studies of UDCA for symptomatic gallstones (key terms included 'ursodeoxycholic acid'; 'UDCA'; 'biliary pain'; and 'biliary colic'). Information was assessed by two authors, including bias assessment, with independent review of conflicts.

resultsOverall, 102 clinicians completed the survey, and 42 per cent had previous experience of using UDCA. Survey responses demonstrated clinical equipoise surrounding the benefit of UDCA for the management of symptomatic gallstones, with no clear consensus for benefit or non-benefit; however, 95 per cent would start using UDCA if there was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) demonstrating a benefit. Eight studies were included in the review: four RCTs, three prospective studies, and one retrospective study. Seven of eight studies were favourable of UDCA for biliary pain. Outcomes and follow-up times were heterogenous, as well as comparator type, with only four of eight studies comparing with placebo.

conclusionEvidence for UDCA in symptomatic gallstones is scarce and heterogenous. Clinicians currently managing symptomatic gallstone disease are largely unaware of the benefit of UDCA, and there is clinical equipoise surrounding the benefit of UDCA. Level 1 evidence is required by clinicians to support UDCA use in the future.

Indexed as

GallstonesUrsodeoxycholic AcidHumansPainProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36952251
PMCPMC10035564
OpenAlexW4360600036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.