ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2023
Beam damage in operando X-ray diffraction studies of Li-ion batteries.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Battery Manufacturing: Synchrotron Characterization for Industry.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Probing Buried Interfaces in Batteries: TowardChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- Multidimensional Tracking and Clustering of Electrochemical Reactions in the Positive Electrode of Lithium-Ion Batteries via Operando X‑ray Nanoscale Chemical Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Identifying and Mitigating Adverse X‑ray Induced Effects in Operando Spectroscopic Studies of Copper Exchanged Zeolites.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025Article
- Understanding Interphases and Interfaces of Battery Materials at the Nanoscale.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Sulfur Speciation in Li-S Batteries Determined byACS applied energy materials · 2024Article
- The AUREX cell: a versatileJournal of applied crystallography · 2024Article
- Beam Effects in Synchrotron RadiationChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Defects and nanostrain gradients control phase transition mechanisms in single crystal high-voltage lithium spinel.Nature communications · 2023Article
- TowardACS materials letters · 2023Review
- How Beam Damage Can Skew SynchrotronACS energy letters · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Operando powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) is a widely employed method for the investigation of structural evolution and phase transitions in electrodes for rechargeable batteries. Due to the advantages of high brilliance and high X-ray energies, the experiments are often carried out at synchrotron facilities. It is known that the X-ray exposure can cause beam damage in the battery cell, resulting in hindrance of the electrochemical reaction. This study investigates the extent of X-ray beam damage during operando PXRD synchrotron experiments on battery materials with varying X-ray energies, amount of X-ray exposure and battery cell chemistries. Battery cells were exposed to 15, 25 or 35 keV X-rays (with varying dose) during charge or discharge in a battery test cell specially designed for operando experiments. The observed beam damage was probed by µPXRD mapping of the electrodes recovered from the operando battery cell after charge/discharge. The investigation reveals that the beam damage depends strongly on both the X-ray energy and the amount of exposure, and that it also depends strongly on the cell chemistry, i.e. the chemical composition of the electrode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.