Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952197›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Assessing Peroxisomal Protein Interaction by Immunoprecipitation.

Suzan Kors, Michael Schrader

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzan KorsFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK. s.kors@exeter.ac.uk.
Michael SchraderFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK. m.schrader@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N01541X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T002255/1Medical Research Council MR/N0137941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organelles physically interact with each other via protein tethering complexes that bridge the opposing membranes. Organelle membrane contacts are highly dynamic, implying dynamism of the tethering complexes. Alterations in the binding of the tethering proteins can be assessed by immunoprecipitation. Antibody-conjugated beads allow for purification of the target protein with its binding partners, which can subsequently be examined by western blot analysis. We present immunoprecipitation methods and strategies to examine protein interaction domains, and for the identification of residues important for the regulation of the interaction, here focusing on phosphorylation. We use the peroxisomal membrane protein ACBD5 and its paralog ACBD4, which both bind ER membrane protein VAPB to mediate peroxisome-ER contacts, as example. However, this method can be applied to other peroxisomal and non-peroxisomal (membrane) proteins.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumMembrane ProteinsIntracellular MembranesPeroxisomesProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsMembrane ProteinsACBD5Co-immunoprecipitationMembrane contact sitesOrganelle interactionsPeroxisomesPhosphorylationProtein binding assayProtein interactionVAPB

Identifiers

PMID36952197
OpenAlexW4360600820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.