ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023
Prevalence and Causes of Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transition of care interventions to manage severe COVID-19 in the ambulatory setting: a systematic review.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The ACEs of Clinical Reasoning: a Formal, Longitudinal, Leadership Role for Medical Students to Augment Clinical Reasoning Education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence, contributing factors, and predictors of diagnostic errors in medical inpatients: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Burnout, PTSD, and Medical Error: The Medico-Legal Implications of the Mental Health Crisis Among Frontline Healthcare Professionals During COVID-19.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Two decades of diagnostic safety research: advances, challenges, and next steps.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- An analysis of cases referred to Polish prosecutor's offices involving suspected medical errors directly and indirectly connected with the COVID-19 pandemic.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Article
- Patient-Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care.JAMA internal medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic required clinicians to care for a disease with evolving characteristics while also adhering to care changes (e.g., physical distancing practices) that might lead to diagnostic errors (DEs).
objectiveTo determine the frequency of DEs and their causes among patients hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19.
designRetrospective cohort.
settingEight medical centers affiliated with the Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network (HOMERuN). TARGET POPULATION: Adults hospitalized under investigation (PUI) for COVID-19 infection between February and July 2020. MEASUREMENTS: We randomly selected up to 8 cases per site per month for review, with each case reviewed by two clinicians to determine whether a DE (defined as a missed or delayed diagnosis) occurred, and whether any diagnostic process faults took place. We used bivariable statistics to compare patients with and without DE and multivariable models to determine which process faults or patient factors were associated with DEs.
resultsTwo hundred and fifty-seven patient charts underwent review, of which 36 (14%) had a diagnostic error. Patients with and without DE were statistically similar in terms of socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, risk factors for COVID-19, and COVID-19 test turnaround time and eventual positivity. Most common diagnostic process faults contributing to DE were problems with clinical assessment, testing choices, history taking, and physical examination (all p < 0.01). Diagnostic process faults associated with policies and procedures related to COVID-19 were not associated with DE risk. Fourteen patients (35.9% of patients with errors and 5.4% overall) suffered harm or death due to diagnostic error. LIMITATIONS: Results are limited by available documentation and do not capture communication between providers and patients.
conclusionAmong PUI patients, DEs were common and not associated with pandemic-related care changes, suggesting the importance of more general diagnostic process gaps in error propagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.