ArticleJournal of medical systems2023
Application of Artificial Neural Network Models to Differentiate Between Complicated and Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence and Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Models.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Pooled it
- TSNet: a multi-modal deep learning framework for subtyping appendicitis: integrating ultrasound images, handcrafted features, and clinical data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Preoperative differentiation of acute appendicitis using NLR, SII, and maximum appendiceal diameter: a retrospective single-center diagnostic study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Deep learning for appendicitis: development of a three-dimensional localization model on CT.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Progress in the application of machine learning in CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning and Feature Selection in Pediatric Appendicitis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Risk prediction and effect evaluation of complicated appendicitis based on XGBoost modeling.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Analysis of risk factors associated with the development and postoperative complications of complicated acute appendicitis in elderly patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Preoperative prediction of complicated appendicitis is challenging, and many clinical tools are developed to predict complicated appendicitis. This study evaluated whether a supervised learning method can recognize complicated appendicitis in emergency department (ED). Consecutive patients with acute appendicitis presenting to the ED were enrolled and included into training and testing datasets at a ratio of 70:30. The multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained to perform binary outcome classification between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. Measures of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR + and LR-), and a c statistic of a receiver of operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate an ANN model. The simplest ANN model by Bröker et al. including the C-reactive protein (CRP) and symptom duration as variables achieved a c statistic value of 0.894. The ANN models developed by Avanesov et al. including symptom duration, appendiceal diameter, periappendiceal fluid, extraluminal air, and abscess as variables attained a high diagnostic performance (a c statistic value of 0.949) and good efficiency (sensitivity of 78.6%, specificity of 94.5%, LR + of 14.29, LR- of 0.23 in the testing dataset); and our own model by H.A. Lin et al. including the CRP level, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, fat-stranding sign, appendicolith, and ascites exhibited high accuracy (c statistic of 0.950) and outstanding efficiency (sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 91.7%, LR + of 10.36, LR- of 0.16 in the testing dataset). The ANN models developed by Avanesov et al. and H.A. Lin et al. developed model exhibited a high diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.