Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952016›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2023

Hospital factors that influence ICU admission decision-making: a qualitative study of eight hospitals.

Thomas S Valley, Amanda Schutz, Jacquelyn Miller, Lewis Miles, Kyra Lipman, Tammy L Eaton, Harish Kinni, Colin R Cooke, Theodore J Iwashyna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intensive care unit outcomes and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas S ValleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16-G019W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. valleyt@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-4970
Amanda SchutzDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16-G019W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Jacquelyn MillerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16-G019W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Lewis MilesDepartment of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kyra LipmanLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Tammy L EatonInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Harish KinniDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Colin R CookeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16-G019W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Theodore J IwashynaDepartments of Medicine and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Promoting Equity via Change in Practice for Respiratory Failure (PRECIPICE)R01HL157361 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG-HOUGH, MARI, VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Preventing avoidable deaths from pneumonia by improving use of intensive careK23HL140165 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2018 to 2022
$915k
Rapid Understanding of Best Practices in Rural Intensive Care (RUBRIC)R01HS028038 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2021 to 2022
$776k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028038NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL140165NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL133988NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSome hospitals in the United States (US) use intensive care 20 times more than others. Since intensive care is lifesaving for some but potentially harmful for others, there is a need to understand factors that influence how intensive care unit (ICU) admission decisions are made.

methodsA qualitative analysis of eight US hospitals was conducted with semi-structured, one-on-one interviews supplemented by site visits and clinical observations.

resultsA total of 87 participants (24 nurses, 52 physicians, and 11 other staff) were interviewed, and 40 h were spent observing ICU operations across the eight hospitals. Four hospital-level factors were identified that influenced ICU admission decision-making. First, availability of intermediate care led to reallocation of patients who might otherwise be sent to an ICU. Second, participants stressed the importance of ICU nurse availability as a key modifier of ICU capacity. Patients cared for by experienced general care physicians and nurses were less likely to receive ICU care. Third, smaller or rural hospitals opted for longer emergency department patient-stays over ICU admission to expedite interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. Fourth, lack of clarity in ICU admission policies led clinicians to feel pressured to use ICU care for patients who might otherwise not have received it.

conclusionHealth care systems should evaluate their use of ICU care and establish institutional patterns that ensure ICU admission decisions are patient-centered but also account for resources and constraints particular to each hospital.

Indexed as

HospitalizationIntensive Care UnitsCritical CareHospitalsHumansPatient AdmissionQualitative ResearchUnited StatesICU admissionsICU triageIntensive care unitQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36952016
PMCPMC10035493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.