Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36952006›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Adjuvant intravesical treatment in patients with intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with BCG versus MMC applied with COMBAT or EMDA. Results of a prospective study.

Miguel Ángel Arrabal Polo, María Teresa Melgarejo Segura, Yaiza Yáñez Castillo, Ana Morales Martínez, Manuel Pareja Vílchez, Miguel Arrabal Martín

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel Ángel Arrabal PoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9774-8485
María Teresa Melgarejo SeguraDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain. mtm.segura@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-2060
Yaiza Yáñez CastilloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-0890
Ana Morales MartínezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Pareja VílchezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain.
Miguel Arrabal MartínDepartment of Urology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. del Conocimiento, s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-1811
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) maintenance therapy is the standard adjuvant treatment of high- and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, the problems of shortages and the adverse effects, both local and systemic, that it causes lead to the search for alternatives with devices that improve the penetration of intravesical chemotherapeutics. MATERIALS AND

methodsProspective observational study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2022. Patients diagnosed with intermediate and high-risk NMIBC without CIS who received one of the following three treatments were included: BCG in induction protocol with six weekly instillations and maintenance with three weekly instillations at months 3, 6, and 12. MMC was applied by Physionizer

resultsOne hundred and eighty-three patients divided into a HIVEC group with sixty-one patients, EMDA group with fifty-nine patients, and BCG group with sixty-three patients. After a mean follow-up of 25 months (IQR 13-36), the 24-month recurrence-free rate was 82.1% for HIVEC, 80% for EMDA, and 84.6% for BCG (p > 0.05), and a progression-free rate at 24 months of 95.6% for HIVEC, 98.3% for EMDA, and 92.9% for BCG (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups with respect to the degree of reported adverse events.

conclusionAdjuvant treatment with BCG or MMC applied with COMBAT or EMDA does not present differences in the recurrence-free rate and progression at 24 months in our population of patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMBC without CIS.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalHumansMitomycinNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineMitomycinBacillus Calmette-GuerinBladder cancerElectromotive forceHyperthermiaIntravesical administrationMitomycin C

Identifiers

PMID36952006
PMCPMC10035471
OpenAlexW4360601209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.