Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951911›Full record

RevieweLife2023

Open-source tools for behavioral video analysis: Setup, methods, and best practices.

Kevin Luxem, Jennifer J Sun, Sean P Bradley, Keerthi Krishnan, Eric Yttri, Jan Zimmermann, Talmo D Pereira, Mark Laubach

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DIPLOMAT: multi-animal tracking with efficient manual editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin Luxem *Cellular Neuroscience, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jennifer J Sun *Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0906-6589
Sean P BradleyRodent Behavioral Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Keerthi KrishnanDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular & Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States.
Eric YttriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.
Jan ZimmermannDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Talmo D PereiraThe Salk Institute of Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-8365
Mark LaubachDepartment of Neuroscience, American University, Washington D.C., United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2403-4497

Funding

Viral Innovation CoreP30DA048742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Mark John Thomas · 2020 to 2026
$19.0M
Rodent Behavioral Core: The Analysis of BehaviorZICMH002952 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI CHUDASAMA, YOGITA · 2016 to 2025
$7.5M
Neural basis of behavioral timescale coordinationR01MH128177 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Jan Zimmermann · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Role of Piriform Cortex Perineuronal Nets in Mouse Social Communication.R15MH124042 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI KRISHNAN, KEERTHI · 2020 to 2020
$451k
Neuronal mechanisms of reward signaling in the prefrontal cortexR15DA046375 · NIDA · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY · PI LAUBACH, MARK · 2018 to 2018
$386k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048742NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA046375NIH HHS DA046375NIH HHS MH002952NIH HHS MH124042NIH HHS MH128177NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128177NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH124042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently developed methods for video analysis, especially models for pose estimation and behavior classification, are transforming behavioral quantification to be more precise, scalable, and reproducible in fields such as neuroscience and ethology. These tools overcome long-standing limitations of manual scoring of video frames and traditional 'center of mass' tracking algorithms to enable video analysis at scale. The expansion of open-source tools for video acquisition and analysis has led to new experimental approaches to understand behavior. Here, we review currently available open-source tools for video analysis and discuss how to set up these methods for labs new to video recording. We also discuss best practices for developing and using video analysis methods, including community-wide standards and critical needs for the open sharing of datasets and code, more widespread comparisons of video analysis methods, and better documentation for these methods especially for new users. We encourage broader adoption and continued development of these tools, which have tremendous potential for accelerating scientific progress in understanding the brain and behavior.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEthologyVideo Recordingbehaviormethodsneuroscienceopen sourcepose estimationreproducibilityvideo

Identifiers

PMID36951911
PMCPMC10036114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read25
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.