Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951855›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

A Duration-Dependent Interaction Between High-Intensity Light and Unrestricted Vision in the Drive for Myopia Control.

Sayantan Biswas, Arumugam R Muralidharan, Bjorn Kaijun Betzler, Joanna Marie Fianza Busoy, Veluchamy A Barathi, Royston K Y Tan, Wan Yu Shermaine Low, Dan Milea, Biten K Kathrani, Noel A Brennan and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spontaneously Myopic Guinea Pig: Model of Early Pathologic Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sayantan BiswasSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Arumugam R MuralidharanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Bjorn Kaijun BetzlerYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Joanna Marie Fianza BusoySingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Veluchamy A BarathiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Royston K Y TanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Wan Yu Shermaine LowSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Dan MileaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Biten K KathraniJohnson and Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Noel A BrennanJohnson and Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Raymond P NajjarSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Singapore Eye Research Institute · SGJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USNational University of Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the duration-dependent and synergetic impact of high-intensity light (HL) and unrestricted vision (UnV) on lens-induced myopia (LIM) development in chickens. Methods: Myopia was induced in one eye in chicks (10 groups, n = 126) from day 1 posthatching (D1) until day 8 (D8) using -10 diopter (D) lenses. Fellow eyes remained uncovered as controls. Nine groups were exposed daily to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL (15,000 lux), UnV (removal of -10 D lens), or both (HL + UnV). One group served as the LIM group without any interventions. Ocular axial length (AL), refractive error, and choroidal thickness were measured on D1, D4, and D8. Outcome measures are expressed as interocular difference (IOD = experimental eye - control eye) ± SEM. Results: By D8, LIM increased AL (0.36 ± 0.04 mm), myopic refraction (-9.02 ± 0.37 D), and choroidal thinning (-90.27 ± 16.44 µm) in the LIM group (all, P < 0.001). Compared to the LIM group, exposure to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL, UnV, or HL + UnV reduced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner, with UnV being more effective than HL (P < 0.05). Only 6 hours of HL + UnV (not 2 or 4 hours) prevented LIM and was more effective than UnV (P = 0.004) or HL (P < 0.001) in reducing myopic refraction and more effective than HL (P < 0.001) in reducing axial elongation. Conclusions: Daily exposure to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL, UnV, or HL + UnV reduced lens-induced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner in chickens. Only 6 hours of HL + UnV completely stopped LIM development. The synergetic effect of HL and UnV is dependent on the duration of the interventions.

Indexed as

ChickensMyopiaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornChoroidDisease Models, AnimalEyeRefraction, OcularVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID36951855
PMCPMC10050902
OpenAlexW4360600706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read20
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.