Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951851›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2023

Attentional allocation and the pan-field color illusion.

Lana Okubo, Kazuhiko Yokosawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lana OkuboDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko YokosawaTsukuba Gakuin University, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPTsukuba Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans subjectively experience a scene as rendered in color across the entire visual field, a visual phenomenon called "pan-field color" (Balas & Sinha, 2007). This experience is inconsistent with the limited color sensitivity in the peripheral visual field. We investigated the effects of visual attention allocated to the peripheral visual field on the pan-field color illusion. Using "chimera" stimuli in which color was restricted to a circular central area, we assessed observers' tendency to perceive color throughout images with achromatized peripheral regions. We separately analyzed sensitivity and response bias in judging the color content of the scene image as full-color, chimera, or gray. Using a dual-task paradigm, we manipulated observers' attentional allocation by controlling the stimulus presentation time of the central task, making the foveal attentional load change. The slope of the foveal load-sensitivity function suggests that attention was modulated by foveal load even in the peripheral visual field. Bias was affected by the size of the central colored area, such that the tendency to answer "full-color" to the chimera image increased with eccentricity. Based on these effects of attention on sensitivity and bias, we suggest that the pan-field color illusion cannot be fully explained by the decrease of sensitivity that is modulated by attentional allocation in the periphery. Our results rather indicate that the pan-field color illusion at least partly reflects a liberal bias in peripheral vision.

Indexed as

IllusionsHumansPhotic StimulationVision, OcularVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID36951851
PMCPMC10050903
OpenAlexW4360601369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.