Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951835›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2023

Pulsed Oral Azithromycin vs 6-Week Oral Doxycycline for Moderate to Severe Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Phit Upaphong, Chulaluck Tangmonkongvoragul, Phichayut Phinyo

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Errors in Abstract and Key Points.JAMA ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  7. Error in Introduction.JAMA ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phit UpaphongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chulaluck TangmonkongvoragulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Phichayut PhinyoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The treatment of moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) with oral doxycycline requires a 6-week course of treatment and has frequent adverse effects (AEs), which may be associated with poor compliance. Objective: To determine if the AEs of a 3-week course of oral azithromycin were equivalent to the AEs of a 6-week course of oral doxycycline. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-masked randomized clinical trial was conducted at a referral center in Thailand from September 2018 to May 2022. Participants with moderate to severe MGD judged unresponsive to conservative management were included. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral azithromycin (1 g once per week for 3 weeks) or oral doxycycline (200 mg daily for 6 weeks). Main Outcomes and Measures: After initiating therapy, the study team assessed the total MGD score and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score at the initial visit, at 6 weeks, and at 8 weeks, and assessed AEs at 6 weeks and 8 weeks. The prespecified equivalence margins for MGD score and OSDI score were set at ±2 and ±9, respectively. Results: A total of 137 eyes from 137 patients were randomized into groups, 68 eyes in the azithromycin group and 69 eyes in the doxycycline group (female, 66.4%; mean age, 62.0 [SD, 15.1] years). The adjusted mean difference of total MGD scores between groups at week 6 and week 8 were -0.33 (95% CI, -1.70 to 1.03; P for equivalence = .01) and 0.13 (95% CI, -1.59 to 1.84; P for equivalence = .02), respectively. The adjusted mean difference of OSDI between groups score at week 6 and week 8 was -1.20 (95% CI, -5.31 to 2.91; P for equivalence  < .001) and -1.59 (95% CI, -5.73 to 2.55; P for equivalence  < .001), respectively. In addition, patients treated with azithromycin had fewer gastrointestinal AEs (4.4% vs 15.9%; risk difference, 11.5%; 95% CI 1.6%-21.4%; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: These data support an equivalency of effects of azithromycin as compared with doxycycline for MGD score and OSDI score at both follow-up times. The study did not show more gastrointestinal AEs in the azithromycin group. The reduced dosing and potentially fewer gastrointestinal AEs associated with azithromycin support its use as an alternative to doxycycline for at least 6 weeks. Trial Registration: ThaiClinicalTrials.org Identifier: TCTR20180810001.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMeibomian Gland DysfunctionAzithromycinDoxycyclineEyeFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDoxycycline

Identifiers

PMID36951835
PMCPMC10037201
OpenAlexW4360599796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.