Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951811›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2023

Impact of an Expanded Definition of Family History on Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Adam C Schneider, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Nicholas Bowler, Ryan Fogg, Joon Yau Leong, Andrew Gusev, Linda H Rodgers, Shelley R McCormick, Douglas M Dahl, Jason A Efstathiou and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam C SchneiderDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thenappan ChandrasekarDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nicholas BowlerDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ryan FoggDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joon Yau LeongDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Andrew GusevDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Linda H RodgersCenter for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shelley R McCormickCenter for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Douglas M DahlDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason A EfstathiouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L BluteDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anthony L ZietmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chin-Lee WuDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew R SmithCenter for Genitourinary Cancers, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eliezer M Van AllenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam S FeldmanDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Keyan SalariDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University · USBroad Institute · USCenter for Assessment · USCenter for Cancer Research · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite family history being an established risk factor for prostate cancer, the role of a broader definition of family history inclusive of not just prostate cancer but other genetically related malignancies has not been investigated in the active surveillance population. Here, we evaluate the impact of an expanded definition of family history on active surveillance outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1997-2019 with detailed data available on family cancer history were identified. Primary outcome was biopsy progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes were treatment-free survival, adverse pathological features at prostatectomy, and biochemical recurrence after treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

resultsAmong 855 evaluable patients, 300 (35.1%) patients had any family history of prostate cancer, and 95 (11.1%) had a family history of related malignancies suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome. Family history of prostate cancer alone was not associated with biopsy progression, whereas family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome was associated with a significantly increased risk of biopsy progression (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.01-2.02), independent of other known clinicopathological risk factors in multivariable analysis. Similarly, family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome was associated with significantly lower treatment-free survival (HR 1.58, 95%CI 1.14-2.18) in multivariable analysis. No significant association was found between family history and adverse features on surgical pathology or biochemical recurrence.

conclusionsAn expanded family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome is an independent predictor of biopsy progression during active surveillance. Men with such a family history may still be offered active surveillance but should be counseled regarding the higher risk of disease progression.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsProstate-Specific Antigenfamilialhereditaryneoplastic syndromesprostate cancerprostatic neoplasmswatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID36951811
PMCPMC12721664
OpenAlexW4323664023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.