Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36951442›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Postponing colonoscopy for 6 months in high-risk population increases colorectal cancer detection in China.

Mingqing Zhang, Yongdan Zhang, Wen Zhang, Lizhong Zhao, Haoren Jing, Xiaojing Wu, Lu Guo, Haixiang Zhang, Yong Zhang, Siwei Zhu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mingqing ZhangNankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5486-2026
Yongdan ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6343-7010
Wen ZhangCenter for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Lizhong ZhaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China.
Haoren JingDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China.
Xiaojing WuThe Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Lu GuoCenter for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haixiang ZhangCenter for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yong ZhangCenter for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Siwei ZhuNankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Shiwu ZhangThe Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5052-2283
Xipeng ZhangNankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-7798
Nankai University · CNTianjin University · CNTianjin People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsColonoscopy is an important colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modality; however, not all high-risk groups identified by fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and/or high-risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ) undergo colonoscopy in time. The impact of delays in colonoscopy on CRC detection among high-risk populations remains poorly understood, warranting further clarification.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted among CRC high-risk population identified by Tianjin CRC screening program. According to the colonoscopy results after HRFQ and FIT, patients were classified into CRC, advanced adenoma, non-advanced adenoma, and normal groups. The time interval between CRC screening and colonoscopy was investigated and its relationship with colonoscopy results. Logistic regression was performed to explore the risk factors of CRC detection.

resultsAmong the high-risk population without a history of CRC or polyps, 49,810 underwent HRFQ, FIT, and colonoscopy, and a time interval of fewer than 6 months was found for 79.56% of patients (n = 39,630). People with positive FIT were more likely to undergo colonoscopy within 6 months, and detection rates of CRC and/or advanced adenoma were positively related to time intervals. Similar results were found in people with a negative FIT but positive HRFQ. A time interval longer than 6 months was a significant predictor of CRC detection in high-risk populations.

conclusionFor high-risk people identified by CRC screening, especially those with a positive FIT, a time interval of 6 months was associated with an increased probability of CRC detection. Our findings emphasize that populations at high risk should undergo colonoscopy at least within 6 months.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsChinaColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscancer preventioncolonoscopycolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID36951442
PMCPMC10242305
OpenAlexW4360601175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.