ArticleHaematologica2023
Graft-
Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of severe and very severe acquired aplastic anemia.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- A prospective, open, single-arm clinical trial of fludarabine- cyclophosphamide-porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin conditioning combined with matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of severe aplastic anemia.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Trial
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes harboring a paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone-a study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies and Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Parties of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Comparable outcomes of HSCT up-front and after failure of IST in pediatric aplastic anemia in recent years.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes between early and delayed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: a single-center retrospective study.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Unrelated donor transplantation for relapsed refractory aplastic anemia, with quadruple GvHD prophylaxis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Donor-recipient age difference, not donor age alone, predicts outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aplastic anemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of offspring and matched unrelated donor transplants in relapsed or refractory severe aplastic anemia patients aged 40-50: a retrospective analysis from the CBMTR over the past decade.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- The state of the art in the treatment of severe aplastic anemia: immunotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation in children and adults.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Shifting Paradigms: The Case of Autologous Reconstitution after an Upfront Matched Unrelated Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Severe Acquired Aplastic Anemia in a Child.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Trends in Outcome of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: 5000 Transplantations and 30 Years of Single-Center Experience.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for severe idiopathic aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved in recent years, approaching 75% at 5 years. However, an SAA-adapted composite endpoint, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS), may more accurately assess patient outcomes beyond survival. We analyzed GRFS to identify risk factors and specific causes of GRFS failure. Our retrospective analysis from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 479 patients with idiopathic SAA who underwent allo-HSCT in two conventional situations: i) upfront allo-HSCT from a matched related donor (MRD) (upfront cohort), and ii) allo-HSCT for relapsed or refractory SAA (rel/ref cohort). Relevant events for GRFS calculation included graft failure, grade 3-4 acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD, and death. In the upfront cohort (n=209), 5-year GRFS was 77%. Late allo-HSCT (i.e., >6 months after SAA diagnosis) was the main poor prognostic factor, specifically increasing the risk of death as the cause of GRFS failure (hazard ratio [HR]=4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-11.83; P=0.010). In the rel/ref cohort (n=270), 5-year GRFS was 61%. Age was the main factor significantly increasing the risk of death (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P<0.001), acute GvHD (HR=1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; P=0.041), and chronic GvHD (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08; P=0.032) as the cause of GRFS failure. GRFS after upfront MRD allo-HSCT was very good, notably with early allo-HSCT, confirming that younger patients with an MRD should be transplanted immediately. GRFS was worse in cases of salvage allo-HSCT, most notably in older patients, questioning the utility of allo-HSCT earlier in the disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.