ArticleNursing open2023
Efficacy of modified team-based learning in a flipped classroom for an acute-care nursing course: A mixed-methods study.
Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of a flipped classroom incorporating modified team-based learning in molecular biology laboratory teaching: a mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Educational outcomes of emerging teaching methods in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Efficacy of modified team-based learning in a flipped classroom for an acute-care nursing course: A mixed-methods study.Nursing open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo test a modified team-based learning approach on undergraduate learning outcomes in an acute-care nursing course in Japan.
designMixed-methods.
methodsStudents worked on three simulated cases, engaged in pre-class preparation, completed a quiz and engaged in group work. We collected data on team approach, critical-thinking disposition and time spent in self-learning at four time-points: before the intervention and after each simulated case. Data were analysed using a linear mixed model, a Kruskal-Wallis test and a content analysis. DATA SOURCES: We recruited nursing students attending a mandatory course in acute-care nursing at University A. Data were collected at four time-points between April and July 2018. Data from 73 of 93 respondents were analysed.
resultsTeam approach, critical thinking and self-learning all increased significantly across the time-points. Four categories emerged from students' comments: 'achievement of teamwork', 'sense of learning efficacy', 'satisfaction with course approach' and 'issues related to course approach'. The modified team-based learning approach led to improvements in team approach and critical-thinking disposition across the course.
conclusionIncorporating team-based learning into the curriculum not only contributes to team building but is also effective as a teaching method to improve student learning. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The intervention led to improvements in team approach and critical-thinking disposition across the course. The educational intervention also led to more time for self-learning. Future studies should include participants from various universities and evaluate the outcomes over a longer period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.