Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950745›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

ANPELA: Significantly Enhanced Quantification Tool for Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics.

Ying Zhang, Huaicheng Sun, Xichen Lian, Jing Tang, Feng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RNAenrich: a web server for non-coding RNA enrichment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  13. ANPELA: Significantly Enhanced Quantification Tool for Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying ZhangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-2573
Huaicheng SunCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xichen LianCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Jing TangDepartment of Bioinformatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Feng ZhuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-0053

Funding

"Double Top-Class" University Project 181201*194232101Fundamental Research Fund for Central Universities 2018QNA7023Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2018QNA7023Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province 2020C03010Leading Talent of the "Ten Thousand Plan" - National High-Level Talents Special Support Plan of China;National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872798National Natural Science Foundation of China U1909208Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LR21H300001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ANPELA is widely used for quantifying traditional bulk proteomic data. Recently, there is a clear shift from bulk proteomics to the single-cell ones (SCP), for which powerful cytometry techniques demonstrate the fantastic capacity of capturing cellular heterogeneity that is completely overlooked by traditional bulk profiling. However, the in-depth and high-quality quantification of SCP data is still challenging and severely affected by the large numbers of quantification workflows and extreme performance dependence on the studied datasets. In other words, the proper selection of well-performing workflow(s) for any studied dataset is elusory, and it is urgently needed to have a significantly enhanced and accelerated tool to address this issue. However, no such tool is developed yet. Herein, ANPELA is therefore updated to its 2.0 version (https://idrblab.org/anpela/), which is unique in providing the most comprehensive set of quantification alternatives (>1000 workflows) among all existing tools, enabling systematic performance evaluation from multiple perspectives based on machine learning, and identifying the optimal workflow(s) using overall performance ranking together with the parallel computation. Extensive validation on different benchmark datasets and representative application scenarios suggest the great application potential of ANPELA in current SCP research for gaining more accurate and reliable biological insights.

Indexed as

ProteomicsWorkflowcell population identificationcomprehensive assessmentparallel computingprotein quantificationsingle-cell proteomicstrajectory inference

Identifiers

PMID36950745
PMCPMC10214264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.