Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950700›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Tracking cognition with the T-MoCA in a racially/ethnically diverse older adult cohort.

Cuiling Wang, Caroline O Nester, Katherine Chang, Laura A Rabin, Ali Ezzati, Richard B Lipton, Mindy J Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cuiling WangSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.
Caroline O NesterDepartment of Psychology Brooklyn College City University of New York (CUNY) Brooklyn New York USA.
Katherine ChangDepartment of Psychology Brooklyn College City University of New York (CUNY) Brooklyn New York USA.
Laura A RabinSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.
Ali EzzatiSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.
Richard B LiptonSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.
Mindy J KatzSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.

Funding

Vascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI mindy katz · 1985 to 2026
$73.9M
Predictive analytics for cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s diseaseK23AG063993 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EZZATI, ALI · 2020 to 2024
$984k
Correction of Bias in Estimating Risk of AD and Cognitive and Mobile Decline Using Auxiliary InformationR21AG056920 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI WANG, CUILING · 2017 to 2018
$459k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG063993NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003949NIA NIH HHS R21 AG056920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the utility of the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) to track cognition in a diverse sample from the Einstein Aging Study. Methods: Telephone and in-person MoCA data, collected annually, were used to evaluate longitudinal cognitive performance. Joint models of T-MoCA and in-person MoCA compared changes, variance, and test-retest reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient by racial/ethnic group. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline performance or longitudinal changes across three study waves for both MoCA formats. T-MoCA performance improved over waves 1-3 but declined afterward. Test-retest reliability was lower for the T-MoCA than for the in-person MoCA. In comparison with non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics performed worse at baseline on both MoCA formats and showed lower correlations between T-MoCA and in-person versions. Conclusions: The T-MoCA provides valuable information on cognitive change, despite racial/ethnic disparities and practice effects. We discuss implications for health disparity populations. Highlights: We assessed the comparability of Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) and in-person MoCA for tracking cognition.Changes within 3 years in T-MoCA were similar to that for the in-person MoCA.T-MoCA is subject to practice effects and shows difference in performance by race/ethnicity.Test-retest reliability of T-MoCA is lower than that for in-person MoCA.

Indexed as

cognitive screeninghealth disparitiesintraclass correlation coefficientMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)neuropsychologypractice effectsracial/ethnic diversityremote cognitive assessmenttelephone screeningtest biastest‐retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID36950700
PMCPMC10026378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.