Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Growth hormone supplementation ameliorates blastocyst euploidy rates and improves pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.

Qingqing Guo, Peihao Liu, Wei Zhou, Mingdi Xia, Jing Li, Juanjuan Lu, Jin-Long Ma, Zi-Jiang Chen, Junhao Yan

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oocyte and dietary supplements: a mini review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The effects of growth hormone on the outcomes ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qingqing GuoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Peihao LiuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wei ZhouCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Mingdi XiaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jing LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Juanjuan LuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jin-Long MaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zi-Jiang ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Junhao YanCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shandong University · CNShandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Growth hormone (GH) supplementation has been shown to improve oocyte quality and live birth, but few studies have examined whether GH can reduce embryonic aneuploidy. Chromosomal abnormalities in preimplantation embryos have been regarded as the principal cause of implantation failure and miscarriage, and an increased percentage of aneuploid embryos has been observed in patient cohorts with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and advanced maternal age. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted on women whose previous PGT-A cycle ended up with no transferrable blastocysts, or the aneuploidy rate was above 50% and no live birth was acquired. The participants were divided into GH co-treatment and comparison groups according to whether GH was administered in the subsequent PGT-A cycle. In addition, within the GH co-treatment group, the previous failed cycle constituted the self-control group. Results: 208 women were recruited in the study (GH co-treatment group: 96 women, comparison group: 112 women). Compared to the self-control and comparison groups, the rate of euploid blastocysts was significantly higher in the GH co-treatment group (GH vs self-control: 32.00% vs 9.14%, odds ratio [OR]: 4.765, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.420-9.385, P < 0.01; GH vs comparison: 32.00% vs. 21.05%, OR: 1.930, 95% CI: 1.106-3.366, P = 0.021), and their frozen embryo transfers resulted in more pregnancies and live births. In the subgroup analysis, for the <35 and 35-40 years groups, the euploidy rate in the GH co-treatment group was significantly higher than those in the self-control and comparison groups, but in the >40 years group, there was no difference in euploidy rate. Conclusion: Our study presents preliminary evidence that GH supplementation may ameliorate blastocyst aneuploidy and improve pregnancy outcomes in women who have previously experienced pregnancy failures along with high aneuploidy rates, particularly in those younger than 40 years. Therefore, the use of GH in such women should be considered. However, considering the limited sample size and mixed indications for PGT-A, further scientific research on the underlying mechanism as well as clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects and optimal protocols.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualPreimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyBlastocystDietary SupplementsFemaleGenetic TestingGrowth HormoneHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesGrowth Hormoneaneuploidyblastocystfrozen embryo transfergrowth hormonepreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID36950683
PMCPMC10025457
OpenAlexW4323315797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read113
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.