ArticleHeliyon2023
Identification and characterization of molecular entities differentially expressed in bacteria genome upon treatment with glyphosate shock.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimetabolites developed from enzymes in the shikimate pathway are appealing targets. There are, however, certain unidentified molecular entities that show bacterial sensitivity to glyphosate shock. This study aims to identify the expression pattern of such entities following treatment with glyphosate shock and to characterize them structurally and functionally. Understanding such entities' catalytic structure and modulatory role guides the design and development of novel antibiotics. This study's functional profiling of 16S rRNA sequencing data and transcriptome analysis of glyphosate-exposedE. coli revealed that two genes were upregulated and twenty-eight were downregulated after glyphosate shock. We discovered the differential expression of some processes based on functional gene analysis, such as global and overview maps (4.2195 on average), carbohydrate metabolism (0.6858 on average), amino acid metabolism (0.5032 on average), and co-factor and vitamin metabolism (0.5032 on average) (0.2876 on average). After examining the two data sets, we discovered that some unidentified proteins were strongly expressed after glyphosate treatment. After examining the two datasets, we discovered a protein with no unique features expressed when treated with glyphosate. The Ecs2020 model looks to be the most stable in structural modeling investigations, while the catalytic residues sought in drug development are anticipated. Furthermore, biological processes and cellular component enrichment analysis revealed that the differentially expressed genes were strongly related to the trehalose manufacturing process and represented the cell membrane's outer membrane component. To estimate the functional gene content of soil sample metagenomics based on 16S rRNA, predictive functional analysis was done with R using the Tax4Fun2 package. On the other hand, transcriptome analysis was carried out using the R tool GEO2R. The results could be a good starting point for making new antibiotic medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.