Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950486›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts.

Mettu S Reddy, Surendra K Mathur, Surendran Sudhindran, Subhash Gupta, Mohamed Rela, Arvinder S Soin, Darius Mirza, Sonal Asthana, Madhusudhan Chinthakindi, Mathew Jacob and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Mettu S ReddyGleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, India.
Surendra K MathurZonal Transplant Coordination Center, Mumbai, India.
Surendran SudhindranAmritha Hospital, Kochi, India.
Subhash GuptaMax Superspecialty Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Mohamed RelaDr Rela Institute & Medical Center, Chennai, India.
Arvinder S SoinMedanta Medicity, Gurgaon, India.
Darius MirzaQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Sonal AsthanaAster CMI Hospital, Benguluru, India.
Madhusudhan ChinthakindiOsmania Medical College & General Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Mathew JacobAster Medicity, Kochi, India.
Vinay KumaranVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Pranjal ModiDr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad, India.
Ravi MohankaSir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Gomathy NarasimhanDr Rela Institute & Medical Center, Chennai, India.
Sujoy PalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Viniyendra PamechaInstitute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amit RastogiMedanta Medicity, Gurgaon, India.
Sanjiv SaigalMax Superspecialty Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Manav WadhawanBL Kapoor-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is increasing in India and now constitutes nearly one-third of all liver transplantation procedures performed in the country. There is currently no uniform national system of allocation of deceased donor livers. Methods: A national task force consisting of 19 clinicians involved in liver transplantation from across the country was constituted under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India to develop a consensus document addressing the above issues using a modified Delphi process of consensus development. Results: The National Liver Allocation Policy consensus document includes 46 statements covering all aspects of DDLT, including minimum listing criteria, listing for acute liver failure, DDLT wait-list management, system of prioritisation based on clinical urgency for adults and children, guidelines for allocation of paediatric organs and allocation priorities for liver grafts recovered from public sector hospitals. Conclusion: This document is the first step in the setting up of a nationally consistent policy of deceased donor liver allocation.

Indexed as

ACLF, acute on chronic liver failureacute liver failureALF, acute liver failureCLD, chronic liver diseaseCSS, Clinical Severity ScoreCSS-P, Clinical Severity Score for Paediatric RecipientsDD, deceased donationDDLG, deceased donor liver graftsDDLT, deceased donor liver transplantationDelphi processHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaLDLT, living donor liver transplantationLT, liver transplantationMELD, Model for End-Stage Liver DiseaseNABL, National Accreditation Board for Testing & Calibration LaboratoriesN-LAP, National Liver Allocation PolicypaediatricPELD, Paediatric Model for End-Stage Liver Diseasepublic sector hospitalPuSH, Public Sector Hospitalvariant syndromeWL, waiting list

Identifiers

PMID36950486
PMCPMC10025588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.