Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950369›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Comparing ant morphology measurements from microscope and online AntWeb.org 2D z-stacked images.

Sándor Csősz, Ferenc Báthori, Zoltán Rádai, Gábor Herczeg, Brian L Fisher

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldFull text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CORRIGENDUM.Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sándor CsőszELKH-ELTE-MTM Integrative Ecology Research Group Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-5120
Ferenc BáthoriDepartment of Systematic Zoology and Ecology Institute of Biology, ELTE-Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5452-5257
Zoltán RádaiLendület Seed Ecology Research Group Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research Vácrátót Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-5055
Gábor HerczegELKH-ELTE-MTM Integrative Ecology Research Group Budapest Hungary.
Brian L FisherEntomology California Academy of Sciences San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-3270
Eötvös Loránd University · HUCalifornia Academy of Sciences · USInstitute of Ecology and Botany · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprecedented technological advances in digitization and the steadily expanding open-access digital repositories are yielding new opportunities to quickly and efficiently measure morphological traits without transportation and advanced/expensive microscope machinery. A prime example is the AntWeb.org database, which allows researchers from all over the world to study taxonomic, ecological, or evolutionary questions on the same ant specimens with ease. However, the reproducibility and reliability of morphometric data deduced from AntWeb compared to traditional microscope measurements has not yet been tested. Here, we compared 12 morphological traits of 46

Indexed as

AntWeb.orgmorphometryreproducibilitystatistical agreementsystematic biasvirtual collection

Identifiers

PMID36950369
PMCPMC10025076
OpenAlexW4327985074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.