Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950356›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

QTL mapping and transcriptome analysis of sugar content during fruit ripening of

Shuang Jiang, Shuigen Li, Jun Luo, Xiaoqing Wang, Chunhui Shi

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuang JiangForestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shuigen LiForestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jun LuoForestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqing WangForestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chunhui ShiForestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar content is an important trait of fruits. The genetic background of fruits can affect their sugar content in different cultivars. The quantitative trait loci and genes related to sugar content during fruit ripening remain unclear. In this study, we performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping of sugar content. Two QTLs (qSugar-LG6-Chr7 and qSugar-LG12-Chr3) were identified based on their total sugar contents. A total of 577 and 519 genes were annotated around these two QTL loci. The contents of fructose, sorbitol, glucose, and sucrose were measured at six time points in four cultivars before fruit maturation, including two sweet cultivars ("Zaoshengxinshui" and "ZQ65") and two general cultivars ("Qiushui" and "ZQ82"). In sweet cultivars, sucrose and fructose accumulate substantially, and sorbitol content decreases significantly during fruit ripening. A transcriptome analysis identified 125 upregulated and 222 downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in sweet cultivars. Two sucrose transport genes (

Indexed as

fruit ripeninggene regulationQTL mappingsugar contenttranscript

Identifiers

PMID36950356
PMCPMC10025493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
table measurements read6
reference markers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.