ArticleFrontiers in physiology2023
A lightweight fetal distress-assisted diagnosis model based on a cross-channel interactive attention mechanism.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CTG-FRAME: development and validation of a multi‑modal deep learning for intrapartum escalation support and severe fetal acidemia prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Fetal Health Diagnosis Based on Adaptive Dynamic Weighting with Main-Auxiliary Correction Network.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Automated interpretation of cardiotocography using deep learning in a nationwide multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning framework for noninvasive fetal ECG signal extraction.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- An investigation of the umbilical artery N-terminal proBrain natriuretic peptide levels of fetuses due to fetal distress in term pregnancies.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal distress is a symptom of fetal intrauterine hypoxia, which is seriously harmful to both the fetus and the pregnant woman. The current primary clinical tool for the assessment of fetal distress is Cardiotocography (CTG). Due to subjective variability, physicians often interpret CTG results inconsistently, hence the need to develop an auxiliary diagnostic system for fetal distress. Although the deep learning-based fetal distress-assisted diagnosis model has a high classification accuracy, the model not only has a large number of parameters but also requires a large number of computational resources, which is difficult to deploy to practical end-use scenarios. Therefore, this paper proposes a lightweight fetal distress-assisted diagnosis network, LW-FHRNet, based on a cross-channel interactive attention mechanism. The wavelet packet decomposition technique is used to convert the one-dimensional fetal heart rate (FHR) signal into a two-dimensional wavelet packet coefficient matrix map as the network input layer to fully obtain the feature information of the FHR signal. With ShuffleNet-v2 as the core, a local cross-channel interactive attention mechanism is introduced to enhance the model's ability to extract features and achieve effective fusion of multichannel features without dimensionality reduction. In this paper, the publicly available database CTU-UHB is used for the network performance evaluation. LW-FHRNet achieves 95.24% accuracy, which meets or exceeds the classification results of deep learning-based models. Additionally, the number of model parameters is reduced many times compared with the deep learning model, and the size of the model parameters is only 0.33 M. The results show that the lightweight model proposed in this paper can effectively aid in fetal distress diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.