Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950103›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2023

COVID-19 vaccine inequity in African low-income countries.

Chifundo Annessia Kunyenje, Gowokani Chijere Chirwa, Sebastian M Mboma, Wingston Ng'ambi, Emmanuel Mnjowe, Dominic Nkhoma, Lucky Gift Ngwira, Marlen Stacey Chawani, Ben Chilima, Collins Mitambo and 2 more

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chifundo Annessia KunyenjeDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Gowokani Chijere ChirwaDepartment of Economics, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Sebastian M MbomaDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Wingston Ng'ambiDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Emmanuel MnjoweDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Dominic NkhomaDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lucky Gift NgwiraDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Marlen Stacey ChawaniDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Ben ChilimaMinistry of Health, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Collins MitamboMinistry of Heath, Research Directorate, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Amelia CrampinMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Joseph Mfutso-BengoDepartment of Health Systems, Health Economics and Policy Unit, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Lilongwe, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equitable access and utilization of the COVID-19 vaccine is the main exit strategy from the pandemic. This paper used proceedings from the Second Extraordinary Think-Tank conference, which was held by the Health Economics and Policy Unit at the Kamuzu University of Health Sciences in collaboration with the Malawi Ministry of Health, complemented by a review of literature. We found disparities in COVID-19 vaccine coverage among low-income countries. This is also the case among high income countries. The disparities are driven mainly by insufficient supply, inequitable distribution, limited production of the vaccine in low-income countries, weak health systems, high vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine misconceptions. COVID-19 vaccine inequity continues to affect the entire world with the ongoing risks of emergence of new COVID-19 variants, increased morbidity and mortality and social and economic disruptions. In order to reduce the COVID-19 vaccination inequality in low-income countries, there is need to expand COVAX facility, waive intellectual property rights, transform knowledge and technology acquired into vaccines, and conduct mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealthcare DisparitiesAfricaDeveloping CountriesHumansCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinedistributionlow-income countriesuptakevaccine coveragevaccine equity

Identifiers

PMID36950103
PMCPMC10025287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read29
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.