Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36950054›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2023

Diagnostic work-up and advancement in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Apostolos Koffas, Alexandros Giakoustidis, Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Petros Bangeas, Dimitrios Giakoustidis, Vasileios N Papadopoulos, Christos Toumpanakis

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Apostolos KoffasCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandros Giakoustidis1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Apostolis PapaefthymiouPancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London, United Kingdom.
Petros Bangeas1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios Giakoustidis1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vasileios N Papadopoulos1st Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christos ToumpanakisCentre for Gastroenterology, Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Papageorgiou General Hospital · GRQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms ranging from well-differentiated, slowly growing tumors to poorly differentiated carcinomas. These tumors are generally characterized by indolent course and quite often absence of specific symptoms, thus eluding diagnosis until at an advanced stage. This underscores the importance of establishing a prompt and accurate diagnosis. The gold-standard remains histopathology. This should contain neuroendocrine-specific markers, such as chromogranin A; and also, an estimate of the proliferation by Ki-67 (or MIB-1), which is pivotal for treatment selection and prognostication. Initial work-up involves assessment of serum Chromogranin A and in selected patients gut peptide hormones. More recently, the measurement of multiple NEN-related transcripts, or the detection of circulating tumor cells enhanced our current diagnostic armamentarium and appears to supersede historical serum markers, such as Chromogranin A. Standard imaging procedures include cross-sectional imaging, either computed tomography or magnetic resonance, and are combined with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. In particular, the advent of

Indexed as

68-gallium-DOTA-Octreotatechromogranin Agut peptide hormoneski67 proliferation indexNETestneuroendocrine tumorsomatostatin receptor scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID36950054
PMCPMC10025557
OpenAlexW4323315922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read163
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.