Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949967›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Airway clearance treatments in bronchiectasis: feasibility of linking survey results to registry data and a survey of patients' and physiotherapists' practices.

Rebecca H McLeese, Katherine O'Neill, Brenda O'Neill, James D Chalmers, Jeanette Boyd, Anthony De Soyza, Ryan McChrystal, Megan L Crichton, Judy M Bradley

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Epidemiology of bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca H McLeeseWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-2503
Katherine O'NeillWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Brenda O'NeillCentre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
James D ChalmersScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Jeanette BoydEuropean Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK.
Anthony De SoyzaFreeman Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8566-0344
Ryan McChrystalWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Megan L CrichtonScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Judy M BradleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBBritish Lung Foundation · GBFreeman Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011263/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: There are limited data on airway clearance treatment (ACT) practices. This study aimed to: 1) assess the feasibility of collecting online surveys on ACTs from patients and physiotherapists and linking the patient survey data to outcome data in the Bronch-UK/EMBARC Registry; 2) assess the association between ACT practices and outcome data; and 3) ascertain the factors affecting physiotherapist ACT practices. Methods: Survey methodology was used to collect data from patients with bronchiectasis and physiotherapists in Northern Ireland. Associations between patient survey data and linked Bronch-UK/EMBARC Registry patient outcome data were explored. Results: It was feasible to conduct an online survey with patients with bronchiectasis and link the data to the Bronch-UK/EMBARC Registry. 13% of patients did not perform ACTs. ACTs were used more often by patients who were symptomatic/had more severe disease compared to those with milder symptoms/disease. Patients used ACTs when they were symptomatic rather than as a preventative management strategy. Physiotherapists generally followed the bronchiectasis guidelines, using the stepwise approach to management. Conclusion: Our survey provided information about the feasibility of linking online survey and patient registry data. This study provides up-to-date information on ACT practice throughout the course of the disease trajectory as well as insight into the implementation of bronchiectasis guidelines by physiotherapists. Future work should explore how to optimise ACT data collection to maximise the use of real-world ACT data in bronchiectasis research and inform priority ACT research questions.

Identifiers

PMID36949967
PMCPMC10026005
OpenAlexW4312076993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read90
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.