Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Immunogenicity against wild-type and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 after a third dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adolescents.

Daniel Leung, Carolyn A Cohen, Xiaofeng Mu, Jaime S Rosa Duque, Samuel M S Cheng, Xiwei Wang, Manni Wang, Wenyue Zhang, Yanmei Zhang, Issan Y S Tam and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04800133 (To Compare the Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of Recommended COVID-19 Vaccines in Young Adolescents and Children in Hong Kong), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04800133 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

To Compare the Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of Recommended COVID-19 Vaccines in Young Adolescents and Children in Hong Kong

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2025Enrolled1,018ConditionsCovid19ArmsTozinameran, CoronaVac, CoronaVac, intradermal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel LeungDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Carolyn A CohenSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiaofeng MuDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jaime S Rosa DuqueDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Samuel M S ChengSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiwei WangDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Manni WangDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wenyue ZhangDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yanmei ZhangDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Issan Y S TamDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jennifer H Y LamDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sau Man ChanDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sara ChaothaiSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kelvin K H KwanSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Karl C K ChanSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
John K C LiSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Leo L H LukSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Leo C H TsangSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Nym Coco ChuSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wilfred H S WongDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Masashi MoriResearch Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University, Nonoichi, Japan.
Wing Hang LeungDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sophie ValkenburgSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Malik PeirisSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wenwei TuDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu Lung LauDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHKU-Pasteur Research Pole · HKIshikawa Prefectural University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine CoronaVac cannot elicit high efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19, especially against the Omicron variant, but that can be improved by a third dose in adults. The use of a third dose of CoronaVac in adolescents may be supported by immunobridging studies in the absence of efficacy data. Methods: With an immunobridging design, our study (NCT04800133) tested the non-inferiority of the binding and neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses induced by a third dose of CoronaVac in healthy adolescents (N=94, median age 14.2 years, 56% male) compared to adults (N=153, median age 48.1 years, 44% male). Responses against wild-type (WT) and BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 were compared in adolescents. Safety and reactogenicity were also monitored. Results: A homologous third dose of CoronaVac further enhanced antibody response in adolescents compared to just 2 doses. Adolescents mounted non-inferior antibody and T cell responses compared to adults. Although S IgG and neutralizing antibody responses to BA.1 were lower than to WT, they remained detectable in 96% and 86% of adolescents. T cell responses to peptide pools spanning only the mutations of BA.1 S, N and M in adolescents were preserved, increased, and halved compared to WT respectively. No safety concerns were identified. Discussion: The primary vaccination series of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for adolescents should include 3 doses for improved humoral immunogenicity.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, InactivatedadolescentCoronaVacCOVID-19Omicronvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36949953
PMCPMC10026957
OpenAlexW4323316243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read145
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.