ReviewGastroenterology report2023
An update on the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organizational models for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review of hospital networks, multidisciplinary care and bloodless programs (2015-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Injectable Hydrogel with Rapid Coagulation, Low Swelling, and High Burst Pressure Tolerance Properties for Long-Term Management of Bleeding Wound.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A nationwide retrospective study of the July effect on nonvariceal upper GI bleeding outcomes in teaching hospitals in the United States.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Hemostatic Decision-Making: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications and Implementation Barriers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative predictive value of AIMS65, Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring Systems in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Update and a Practical Diagnostic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy of omeprazole combined with endoscopic hemostasis in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Endoscopic clip systems for hemostasis and defect closure in gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal bleeding care across hospital and EMS settings in the Almaty region: a cross-sectional survey of organization, practice, and service capacity.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- CHANGING PATTERNS IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ACUTEGASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN BRAZIL OVER THE LAST 12 YEARS.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Article
- Endoscopic hemostasis combined with vascular interventional therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Personalized Acute Upper GI Bleeding Diagnostics for Patients at Highest Risk for Endoscopy: Real-World Experience of a Novel, Binary, Bedside Gastric Blood Detection Device.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Good performance of monoclonal antibody-based stool H. pylori antigen tests in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparison of the new risk score (ABL) with the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- The role of the Lactate-to-Albumin ratio in predicting ICU admission and mortality in patients with UGIB presenting to the ED: a prospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) continues to be a common gastrointestinal emergency that carries significant morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology of UGIB has been changing over the last few decades with an overall decrease in peptic ulcer disease and increase in the prevalence of other etiologies including vascular lesions and malignancy. Appropriate risk assessment and patient stratification are crucial to ensuring that optimal care is delivered to patients and some risk assessment tools have shown excellent ability to define a low-risk group who can be managed as outpatients safely. Regardless of the etiology of UGIB, resuscitative interventions by primary care providers remain the most important initial measures to improve the outcome for patients including hemodynamic stabilization, an appropriate blood transfusion strategy, with or without acid-lowering agents, while also providing subsequent urgent endoscopic assessment and intervention. In addition, with increasing use of antithrombotic agents in clinical practice and its associated risk of bleeding, the management of such agents in the acute setting has become a real challenge to all physicians. In this article, we provide an up-to-date, evidence-based, practical review of recent changes and advances in UGIB with a focus on non-variceal etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.