ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023
Inferring influence of people's emotions at court on defendant's emotions using a prediction model.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- What's emotion got to do with it? Reflections on the buildings of the Portuguese (Family) Courts.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People's emotions may be affected by the sound environment in court. A courtroom's sound environment usually consists of the people's voices, such as the judge's voice, the plaintiff's voice, and the defendant's voice. The judge, plaintiff, and defendant usually express their emotions through their voices. Human communication is heavily reliant on emotions. Emotions may also reflect a person's condition. Therefore, People's emotions at the Court must be recognized, especially for vulnerable groups, and the impact of the sound on the defendant's motions and judgment must be inferred. However, people's emotions are difficult to recognize in a courtroom. In addition, as far as we know, no existing study deals with the impact of sound on people in court. Based on sound perception, we develop a deep neural network-based model to infer people's emotions in our previous work. In the proposed model, we use the convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network to obtain features from speech signals and apply a dense neural network to infer people's emotions. Applying the model for emotion prediction based on sound at court, we explore the impact of sound at court on the defendant. Using the voice data collected from fifty trail records, we demonstrate that the voice of the judge can affect the defendant's emotions. Angry, neutrality and fear are the top three emotions of the defendant in court. In particular, the judge's voice expressing anger usually induces fear in the defendant. The plaintiff's angry voice may not have a substantial impact on the defendant's emotions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.