Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949767›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2023

Impact of risk communication on patient's safety during the pandemic.

Heyde-Patricia Zuluaga-Arias, Mayada Alkhakany, Manal M Younus, Houda Sefiani, Angela Caro-Rojas, Sameh Al-Zubiedi, Wafi F Albalawi, Thamir M Alshammari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Heyde-Patricia Zuluaga-AriasColombian Association of Pharmacovigilance, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-0454
Mayada AlkhakanyBoehringer Ingelheim; International Society of Pharmacovigilance Patient Engagement SIG, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-2246
Manal M YounusIraqi Pharmacovigilance Center, Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq.
Houda SefianiInternational Society of Pharmacovigilance - Middle East Chapter Rabat, Morocco.
Angela Caro-RojasPontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sameh Al-ZubiediInternational Society of Pharmacovigilance - Middle East Chapter, Amman, Jordan.
Wafi F AlbalawiCommunity Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thamir M AlshammariCommunity Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11421.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-2468
King Saud University · SABoehringer Ingelheim (Egypt) · EGColombian Association of Surgery · COInternational University of Rabat · MAMinistry of Health · IQPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 2 years has passed since the pandemic was declared in 2019 due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was later declared to be the pathogen causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). During this time, many healthcare systems faced numerous challenges to control the high morbidity and mortality of the disease. Unlike previous pandemics, the actions against this pandemic started quickly on both the global and country levels. These actions were, scientifically, to study the virus as well as transmission process and to develop medications and vaccines against it. Also, we had to protect people from transmission by knowing how best to apply precautionary methods. However, there were some unexpected negative consequences of the pandemic and one of those the World Health Organization (WHO) called 'infodemic'. This term infodemic refers to the manipulation of a population's behavior in the assessment of information (or, more accurately, lack of assessment) related to the use of medications, particularly vaccines. Unfortunately, even with positive development in science, there was limited and often contradictory amount of information on the safety and efficacy profile of drugs and vaccines. Therefore, this made it harder for public health agencies to determine the impact of the incidence of adverse reactions and events associated with interventions such as vaccines. Hence, risk communication needs to be emphasized during any pandemic, as ignoring risk communications to different stakeholders could undermine all well-intended therapeutic interventions. Given this, it is important that the different stakeholders involved (health authorities, societies, healthcare professionals, etc.) assess the different behavioral patterns within their respective populations and propose appropriate strategies to act. Such an approach complement having risk management and communication plans for this and future pandemics. The aim of this article is to explore how information management, risk management, and risk communication during the pandemic can provide valuable lessons for the future. Plain language summary:

Indexed as

COVID-19infodemicspharmacovigilancerisk communicationrisk managementvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36949767
PMCPMC10026095
OpenAlexW4327794554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.