Observational studyIndian journal of pediatrics2024
Validation of a Clinical Tool to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Critically Ill Children-A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a Clinical Tool to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Critically Ill Children-A Prospective Observational Study: Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Validation of a Clinical Tool to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Critically Ill Children-A Prospective Observational Study: Authors' Reply.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Electrical impedance tomography provides information of brain injury during total aortic arch replacement through its correlation with relative difference of neurological biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quest for a Whimsical Prescient Tool!Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the performance of the empiric tool by Gupta et al. in predicting neurological outcomes in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to evaluate the association of biomarkers S100B and NSE with neurological outcomes.
methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in 163 critically ill children aged 2 mo to 17 y admitted to the PICU from June 2020 to July 2021. The authors used the prediction tool developed by Gupta et al.; the tool was applied at admission and at PICU discharge/death. Samples for NSE and S100B were collected at admission and discharge. The performance of the new tool was assessed through discrimination and calibration. Risk factors for "unfavorable outcomes" (decline in PCPC score by > 1) were evaluated by multivariate analysis.
resultsThe PICU mortality was 28% (n = 45). When the tool developed by Gupta et al. was used at the time of admission, favorable neurological outcomes were predicted for 69% (112) children. The area under the curve for the new tool at admission was 0.72 and at discharge/death it was 0.99, and the calibration was excellent at both time points. Independent factors associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes were higher PCPC scores and organ failure. As the number of samples processed for NSE and S100B was less, statistical analysis was not attempted.
conclusionsThe new tool by Gupta et al. has good discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, and specificity and can be used as a prediction tool. NSE and S100B are promising biomarkers and need further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36949369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.