ArticleParasitology research2023
Impact of MiraNet® long-lasting insecticidal net against Anopheles arabiensis wild population of Northern Tanzania.
Article in Parasitology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite high levels of pyrethroid resistance reported in malaria vectors, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LNs) still play a key role in controlling malaria transmission. This study tested the efficacy of MiraNet®, a pyrethroid-based LN against a wild population of Anopheles arabiensis in northern Tanzania. DuraNet® was used as a positive control in this evaluation. Standard WHO laboratory bioefficacy evaluations of MiraNet and DuraNet that were unwashed or had been washed 20 times indicated optimal knockdown and mortality for both net types against a susceptible strain of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Standard experimental hut evaluations were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of both nets against a wild population of An. arabiensis. The killing effect of MiraNet was 54.5% for unwashed and 50% for 20 times washed while DuraNet achieved 44.4% mortality for unwashed and 47.4% for 20 times washed against wild An. arabiensis. Both DuraNet and MiraNet exhibited significantly higher killing effects (> 44.4%). There was no significant difference in deterrence or induced exophily detected between the treatment arms for either net. Additionally, there were no adverse effects reported among hut sleepers. The results of this study indicate that the pyrethroid net MiraNet can be used effectively against wild populations of An. gambiae s.l. of low to moderate resistant levels from Northern Tanzania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36949289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.